I’m half-tempted to dub 2012 The Year of the Enigma Film.
Perhaps “enigma” isn’t right, maybe “polarizing” is more accurate. But what I’m
getting at is that 2012 seems to be cinematically defined by films that have
divided.
I’m not sure I’ve heard of anyone liking Holy Motors. I’ve read several reviews
of love, and just as many of hate. For every person who considers David
Cronenberg’s Cosmopolis a disastrous
waste of time (like me), there is a Top 10 list to argue otherwise. The Master, Cloud Atlas, Lincoln, hell, all the back to Haywire,
people can’t seem to find common ground this year. And you know what? I dig it.
It’d be boring as shit if we all agreed on what’s gold and what’s garbage. Now, to
add to the separation, we have Andrew Dominik’s Killing Them Softly, a comedy crime drama to end all comedy crime
dramas.
About six minutes into Killing
Them Softly, I knew precisely why my foreign friends loved it and many Americans
hate it: the film is slow, laboriously conversational, crude, and in no way the
action shoot ‘em up that its trailers have promised. Oh, and star Brad Pitt
isn’t in it half as much as you’d think. Now, while what I’ve just described
may not tickle the fancy of domestic audiences (including several people I saw
the film with, who left long before the final credits cued), it is a film that
is perfectly suited to my tastes.
Killing Them Softly
begins in a way I’ve never seen a film begin. The credits are scored to
inexplicably unsettling musical tones, which are feverishly crosscut with a man
in silhouette walking out of a tunnel. When we’re on the man, we hear ecstatic
cheers nearly drown out a speech given by (then) Senator Barack Obama. Cut to
credits, haunting music. Cut to man walking, Obama speech. Back and forth and
back and forth. An eerie intro that paves way for something destined to be
different.
The man walking is Russell (Ben Mendelsohn, perfect in Animal Kingdom, better here) a greasy
thief meeting his paranoid partner, Frankie (Scoot McNairy) to discuss a job
with a local thug. The job in question is knocking off an underground card game
run by Markie Trattman (Ray Liotta, bloated and flawless). Once the game is
successfully robbed, the charming, cold, and calculating Jackie (Brad Pitt,
continuing his impeccable roll) is brought in to find those responsible. And
that’s the film. Kind of.
I’m glossing over details, because that’s where the beauty
lies. Point in fact, Killing Them Softly
never makes watching it an easy experience. As is evident in his masterful,
criminally ignored The Assassination of
Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford, Andrew Dominik would much rather
talk about something, than do something. The (many) conversations that the
(many) layered characters partake in during this film are extended and
seemingly superfluous. Often, they aren’t even talking about the film’s story
at hand, but rather, the whore’s they’ve screwed, the heroin they’re going to
buy, or the nabbed dogs they’re going to sell.
Now, while I can see how this method of movie conversation
can throw some (most…?) viewers off, I’d argue that this intense level of
character development allows the viewer to really know the film’s characters, as opposed to just what they aim to do. Must movies gives us the what, rarely do we
fully comprehend the why.
Take, for instance, James Gandolfini’s character, Mickey, in
this film, who is brought in to help Jackie whack those who need whacking.
Gandolfini is in two scenes in Killing Them
Softly, and I know more about him than I do about most movie characters in
films released this year. His desperation and anger and dread and self-loathing
– a lot of that comes from Gandolfini being a very good actor, but much of it
is in the weighty script.
This is a different kind of film for a different kind of
audience. Personally, I can’t tell you how refreshing I find a movie that takes
risks; a movie made by an outsider who somehow painted a more accurate picture
of America (and the tarnished American dream), better than most Americans do. Killing
Them Softly certainly isn’t for everyone, and it certainly doesn’t pretend to
be. By the end (the glorious, perfectly-timed end), I was sitting back,
marveling at something I had never seen before, and likely won’t see again for
many years to come. A
Good review. I have to see this.
ReplyDeleteI totally think this is the year of the enigmatic Film. Or in my case, "year of the films that baffle me because I have nothing to compare them to".
Thanks! Ha, that may be a better way to describe this year in film. Such unique pictures all around. Crazy shit.
DeleteA brilliant analysis... one that carries a breath of fresh air and is closest to my estimation of the movie.
ReplyDeleteHere's my review of Killing Them Softly:
http://www.apotpourriofvestiges.com/2012/10/killing-them-softly-andrew-dominik-parable-american-capitalism.html
Wow, thanks so much man, really glad you dug the review.
DeleteOff to scope yours out now, thanks so much for stopping by!
Good to hear you enjoyed it! I liked it but got a little bored in the 2nd half. I loved Mendelsohn (I'm biased though!) and his character was cracking me up so much. I know there is more of a message to take in but I was happy I was able to understand at least the tip of the iceberg. Great review!
ReplyDeleteThanks man! I can totally see how people would be bored by the second half, the first half, or all of it period. A very very different kind of filmmaking. TONS of "messaging" going on here, no doubt... all of which I won't even pretend to be an expert on. Loved the film regardless though.
DeleteFuck CinemaScore. Why would I pay attention to their idiotic bullshit? I thought this was a really good movie. Sure, it was flawed but it made a lot of sense into the criminal underworld.
ReplyDeleteFuck 'em indeed! Mo'rons. I agree, a really good flick that exposes the criminal underworld quite well.
Delete"Bloated and flawless" - LOL! I loved the character development too. Also, the drug scene was done in a way I've never seen a drug scene done to really bring the audience into the experience. Alex, you are a great writer and this is a masterpiece of a review. Thanks for sharing!
ReplyDeleteAww thanks Fly! That means the world to me. That herion scene was remarkable, I've never seen anything like that either. Usually, the director relies on the actor to sell it (which Mendelsohn did), but those added effects were trippy and perfect. Glad you liked the movie!
DeleteGood review Alex. I can see why the regular, movie going audience wouldn't fall all over this like the critics have, but still, AN F!!?!? It's sort of like a cheaper-version of a Tarantino movie and that's what I liked so much about it. It builds and builds-up it's tension through conversations that seem like they don't go anywhere, that is, until the violence comes out of nowhere and it makes a whole bunch of sense.
ReplyDeleteThanks Dan! Yup, I agree 100% with you assessment here. Having extended conversations that seemingly go nowhere is destine to polarize an audience, but count me as being on the plus side. It just worked. In all the best, most sincere ways. (For me.)
DeleteI enjoyed the drama and performances, and the direction of several scenes of rising tension was masterful, but this film felt like less than the sum of its parts to me.
ReplyDeleteThe political speeches and commentary in the background were unnecessary and distracting, and the same has to be said for Gandolfini's character, not that this takes away from the actor himself, as he certainly sold himself well, albeit that this role wasn't a stretch for him.
Some films get better in your mind as time goes on, and some get worse. This was the latter for me. I walked out thinking 3 1/2 - 4 stars, but it loses half a star each time I think of it. This says the negative aspects stayed with me longer than the positive, but to be fair to the director, at least it has stayed with me, and I still enjoy debating the film five or six weeks later. Full credit for that.
You're definitely not the first, second or last person I've heard not dig the political commentary and some (or all) of the performances. I'm not sure if the political speeches were necessary but, by the end, I knew exactly what Dominik was trying to achieve, and I was stunned.
DeleteI think staying power is one of the most crucial aspects to loving a film. Sorry this one has all but left you; only getting more intense for me.
I really enjoyed this movie and in particular some of the longer scenes filled with dialogue that will live longer with me than the memory of the movie itself.
ReplyDeleteI loved both major scenes with Gandolfini, he owned that character in every way.
The tension in the 'hold up' scene with McNairy and Mendelsohn was epic and God I loved Brad Pitt's quote as the movie ends, now I just have to find a way to use it myself.
Nice man, glad you liked this one. I really though Gandolfini completely stole the show. Best performance of the film in my opinion. That man plays sleaze like no other.
DeleteOh Christ, that hold up scene was unbearably tense - so masterful. And the punchline at the end, I mean, God. Damn.
Boom! Loved the film. Can understand some viewers' frustration, but I found the dialogue exchanges to define these characters and relay different levels of the criminal world - the lowlives desperate for a buck, the highly-payed but sloppy hitman who wallows in excess and the true professional who gets screwed out of his cut because he has to clean up after EVERYONE. One of the best endings of the year, too. Expert performances across the board. Some of the politics lack subtlety, but there's a lot more depth to this simple plot than you'd expect - and every line says just as much as the gun-toting.
ReplyDeleteI agree: the politics were initially off-putting but it added so much more than movies with similar stories set out to achieve.
DeleteThis flick, really from its first frame, had me completely floored. I was on edge the entire time, and I love that the tension never fully broke (by, you know, having a giant shootout or something). It just hit for me in all the proper ways. You were spot-on here!
Man, that's a brilliant way to describe film in 2012. You forgot to mention Cloud Atlas though. ;)
ReplyDeleteGlad to hear the cast is in fine form. I'm a fan of TAOJJBTCRF, so I hope I like it as much as you did. Should be seeing this very soon.
Shit, Cloud Atlas, the personification of polarization. Just amended the review, HAD to include it. Good call! You and I often have similar taste in films (not always, but often), so I'll be damn curious to hear your thoughts.
DeleteNice, and thanks man! Having seen it now, I'd say it's a solid, if uneven, film (A-), but I want to see it again. By the way, can we start the Best Supporting Actor campaign for Scoot McNairy? He was terrific!
DeleteMcNairy was so good. Loved the hell out of his work. I really thought everyone here was in top form. Killed it.
DeleteYeah, I went to see this with my flatmate (we both do film studies - although I also study creative writing - he doesn't seem to really have much interest in film as an artform, though). I liked it, he didn't, and your review's definitely made me wanna watch it again (not sure about an A grade, but whatever). Brutal, socially-conscious, cynical, and intriguingly mundane. When they give Ray Liotta that beating? Most violent scene I've watched this year, and fuckin' right that Gandolfini is great in this.
ReplyDeleteDude, that Liotta beat down was fucking relentless. I've gotten my fair share of ass whoppings, and that was one of the more realistic I've seen. Not excessive (like baseball bats to the face over and over, crowbars to the neck, etc) and Liotta's pain was SO accurate.
DeleteGandolfini was a pathetic force of nature, loved him. I honestly didn't expect many people to love this as much as I did. It just worked for me. Thanks, as always, for your groovy insight.
Awesome review! I'm really looking forward to this one - Pitt rarely stars in bad films and Jenkins and Gandolfini are always great to see on screen.
ReplyDeleteI agree about polarizing year in cinema - it sure is interesting, I love it when things get heated and usually when people hate and love films they write about them a lot which in both cases can provide insight into things in those movies I completely missed.
As for the Cinemascore - awww, Breaking Dawn...I gave it B, it was fun movie, aware of what it was and entertaining. Haven't seen Alex Cross yet but it looks hilariously bad and that is always fun.
It's interesting how you wrote that there is a lot of talking here and you liked it, but with Lincoln you had an issue with it. I'm waiting for both so I wonder if I will also like one and dislike another :)
Thanks! I'll be really curious to hear what you have to say about this one. Have a feeling you'll either love it or detest it.
DeleteCinemascore... hey, people like what they like, and that's cool. But Killing Them Softly is not an F movie. Period.
Good comparison to the plentiful dialogue here compared to Lincoln. I found that every single thing that came out of the characters' mouths in Killing Them Softly was wholly interesting, whereas in Lincoln, it was repetitive and incomprehensible. I definitely understand that the manner of speaking back in Lincoln's day was far more grandiose than it is now, but wow, words have never been closer to putting me to sleep than they did there. So bored.
Excellent review. Just got back from seeing this the cinema, my first trip there in a while, and I have to say that while I didn't love it, it sure was really enjoyable and fantastically well-made. Not enough Ray Liotta though, haha
ReplyDeleteThanks man! I think I'm one of the very few people who fuckin' loved this movie from start to finish. I really enjoyed every aspect of it. But yeah, you can never have too much Liotta.
Delete